I was delighted to read Seth Godin’s latest blog post, “Is Marketing Evil?” on the bus to work this morning — heck, I was charmed by the title alone, seeing as how Godin is an amazing marketer and I love people who can laugh at how others perceive them. We devoted a large chunk of The Boss of You to marketing, and a decent percentage of those pages are musings on how to market your wares without selling your soul to the devil.
I agree with Godin’s conclusion:
For me, marketing works for society when the marketer and consumer are both aware of what’s happening and are both satisfied with the ultimate outcome.
He sets out some ethical guidelines as well, which mostly have to do with not using marketing to persuade people to do stuff that’s bad for them and/or for society as a whole. But beyond those ethical baselines, he’s arguing for transparency:
Marketing has more reach, with more speed, than it has ever had before. With less money, you can have more impact than anyone could have imagined just ten years ago. The question, one I hope you’ll ask yourself, is what are you going to do with that impact?
[...] Just because you can market something doesn’t mean you should. You’ve got the power, so you’re responsible, regardless of what your boss tells you to do.
The good news is that I’m not in charge of what’s evil and what’s not. You, your customers and their neighbors are. The even better news is that ethical, public marketing will eventually defeat the kind that depends on the shadows. Just ask Bernie Madoff.
This is a smart way to look at the ethics of marketing in our current cultural reality: You can look at business as a fast-buck opportunity, and pour a ton of energy into tricking people out of their money — or you can build an ever-widening community of customers, vendors and prospects where your relationships with them are based on trust, shared values and mutual interests. You might be able to get away with the former in the short term, but taking a longer view, the latter is where the smart money is. The relationships you forge are deeper and longer-lasting, and can withstand the occasional hiccup or mistake; but furthermore, as more and more business is conducted online, there is a real risk that unethical business practices will not only come back to bite you in the ass, but they could actually damage your reputation in far-reaching ways.
What Godin’s post encapsulates for me bears a close kinship to something I hear a lot amongst the social media / Web 2.0 crowd, i.e. that trust and transparency are increasingly central to business relationships. Customers are looking to companies to prove their trustworthiness by providing them with open access to information, timely and attentive service, and evidence that they value the input and feedback of their customers. In other words, we want real relationships with the real people behind the brands.
This shifts the conversation about marketing in a fundamental way, because rather than getting distracted by the individual tools in the marketer’s toolkit — magazine ads, billboards, blogs, email newsletters, etc. etc. — we can focus on the deeper goal, which is to create meaningful relationships. Starting from that seed point, we can branch out into the specifics of how those relationships can be forged and nourished. Marketing becomes a more holistic process, one that reaches to the roots of how you run your business.
It’s incredibly exciting to me to see how this is going to pan out for the values-driven, “small is beautiful” businesses for whom we wrote our book, because a lot of the entrepreneurs we spoke to are people who seek out those same qualities in their relationships with their customers, and who strive to embody their best values in every aspect of their personal and business lives. But we’ve also heard a lot of resistance to self-promotion, in part because some of us associate “marketing” with white-washing, or even downright deception. The fact is that marketing need not — in fact, should not — involve anything that makes you feel sleazy or dishonest, or that misleads, manipulates, or insults the intelligence of your target audience. And if you can focus on the relationship with your customer, and on building mutual trust with them, you won’t go far wrong.







2 responses so far ↓
1 Madeleine // Feb 24, 2009 at 9:34 pm
Awesome post, Lauren! Just a quick question – we have heard concerns expressed by some colleagues about privacy with respect to social marketing lately. How do privacy concerns jive with the new ethos of relationship, intimacy, trust, transparency etc for small online businesses in your view?
2 Lauren // Feb 25, 2009 at 10:18 am
Wow, that’s a big question! And a great one, of course. :)
First and foremost, I think everyone who communicates online needs to give serious thought to this question – and privacy concerns are not limited to social media contexts. Sure, Facebook, Twitter, and the like blur the boundaries between personal and professional, but even emails can end up in the wrong hands.
My personal approach in using social marketing has been to keep the conversation limited to things I’m not afraid to share widely. That means I don’t talk about my personal life in great detail, though given how personal Emira and I used to get in our Soapboxgirls writing (back in the day), I am less squeamish than some about sharing the odd personal detail.
(I’m also of the belief that if you want to share personally intimate details online, and you have qualms about the ramifications of doing so, that pseudonyms are your friend. And I believe you can establish a pretty high degree of trust online even using a pseudonym. But that’s a bit of a tangent.)
In my view, there’s plenty of room for protecting one’s privacy and establishing clear boundaries between the professional and the personal. Some people may be very comfortable having strangers follow them on Twitter, for example, while others protect their updates so they can hand-pick their followers. That’s totally legit. On the other hand, if I saw that a company had set up a Twitter feed and protected their updates, that would seem deeply weird to me.
I think where transparency comes in is in communicating clearly with your audience about who you are and where your boundaries lie — and in being consistent with those boundaries. So long as you establish clear expectations as to just how personal, available, and active you are in the social media sphere, and you continue to meet those expectations, you’re golden. And those expectations can also be shifted — for example, you could decide to protect your Twitter updates and block a bunch of your followers, in which case I would suggest sending private messages to those people explaining your reasons (perhaps linking to a blog post given the 140-character limit). That’s just one example, but to me the key is open, honest communication both with yourself and with others. Hope that doesn’t sound too pat, but this really is a huge topic and I feel like I’m struggling to scratch the surface.
I’d love to hear more specifics about the concerns you’re hearing; perhaps I could address them in a separate blog post?
Leave a Comment